2025年04月09日 星期三 首页   |   期刊介绍   |   编 委 会   |   投稿指南   |   期刊订阅   |   下载中心   |   联系我们   |
应用心理学
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
两起波音737 MAX空难的致因分析: 基于人—自动化交互的FLAP模型
王新野 ,王朔,林靖康,杜磊
1.西北政法大学公安学院,西安710122; 2.陕西师范大学心理学院,西安 710062;3.西藏航空有限公司,成都 610200)
Cause Analysis of two Boeing 737 MAX Crashes:#br# Based on FLAP Model of Human-Automation Interaction
WANG Xin-ye,Wang Shuo, Lin Jing-kang, Du Lei
1.School of Public Security, Northwestern University of Politics and Law, Xi’an 710122, China; 2.School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China; 3.Tibet Airlines Co., Ltd, Chengdu, China
全文: PDF (1515 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
研究要点
1. 系统地分析出波音737 MAX事故中的人—自动化交互失败的原因。
2. 验证了FLAP模型在分析飞行员—自动化交互中是一种有效的认知工具。
3. 要重视“以人为中心”的系统设计理念和航空安全文化建设。
摘要 

两起波音737 MAX飞机坠毁事故的调查认为,存在致命设计缺陷的MACS是导致两起空难的直接原因。MACS的运行逻辑及其行为脱离了机组对波音737系列飞机操控系统的理解,因此两起空难是典型的人—自动化交互失败的案例。FLAP模型有助于研究者以自上而下的、通用化的方法来模拟现今商业运输飞机中与自动化系统相关的问题,利用FLAP模型可以逆向回溯两起空难的成因:除了MACS设计不良之外,波音公司和FAA未遵守航空安全文化是造成两起事故的深层次原因。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王新野
王朔
林靖康
杜磊
关键词 波音737 MAX 人—自动化交互 FLAP模型系统设计航空安全文化    
Abstract:In less than five months from October 2018 to March 2019, two newly delivered Boeing 737 MAX aircraft crashed one after another. Accident investigations have identified fatal design flaws in the MACS as the proximate cause of both crashes. Boeing designed MCAS to automatically control the horizontal stabilizer in the tail of the aircraft to improve the pitch characteristics of the aircraft. However, the logic of the MACS operation and its behavior were divorced from the crews’ understanding of the Boeing 737 family of aircraft control systems, so the two crashes were classic examples of human-automation interaction failures. Different from other human-automation interaction models, FLAP model not only examines the interaction problems when the automation system and human are functioning properly, but also includes the crew defects, automation system failures and avionics system abnormalities. The FLAP model would help researchers to simulate the problems associated with automation systems in today’s commercial transport aircraft in a top-down, generalizable way. The FLAP model could be used to trace back the causes of the two air accidents. The study found that, in addition to poor MACS design, Boeing and the FAA’s failure to adhere to aviation safety culture was the most profound cause of the two accidents. Therefore, the system design should adhere to the human-centered principle; regulators, aircraft manufacturers and operating companies all need to strengthen aviation safety culture. Finally, the study also verified that the FLAP model was an excellent cognitive tool for analyzing the interaction between pilot and automation.
Key wordsBoeing 737 MAX    human-automation interaction    FLAP model    system design    aviation safety culture
     出版日期: 2023-10-18
引用本文:   
王新野,王朔,林靖康, 杜磊. 两起波音737 MAX空难的致因分析: 基于人—自动化交互的FLAP模型[J]. 应用心理学, 2024, 30(6): 483-494.
WANG Xin-ye,Wang Shuo, Lin Jing-kang, Du Lei. Cause Analysis of two Boeing 737 MAX Crashes:#br# Based on FLAP Model of Human-Automation Interaction. 应用心理学, 2024, 30(6): 483-494.
链接本文:  
http://www.appliedpsy.cn/CN/Y2024/V30/I6/483
版权所有 © 应用心理学杂志社   浙公网安备 33010602002302号    备案号:浙ICP备16001248号-1
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn